Red, White & Bruised – Bank of America – The Aftermath

November 4th, 2011

I’ll begin this epistolary with one simple question…

Be honest….what comes to mind when someone mentions Bank of America?

What does that red, white and blue iconic logo conjure up in your mind when the payment coupon for your mortgage arrives in the mail or you pull out your debit card or VISA? You know the one: looks like an Andy Warhol depiction of the American flag unfurled over the rolling hills of the central plains.

Does the mere mention of this corporation’s name evoke more personal emotion in you than most? Negative emotions like rage, anger, frustration, even hatred? After all, Bank of America was voted the 19th most hated company by the American Customer Satisfaction Index in 2011; received very low scores in a recent Zogby/MSN customer satisfaction poll; was also rated the worst bank in the same poll (The Atlantic, January 5, 2011) and, of course, B of A made #9 on the Most Hated Corporations in America list according to a study conducted by Harris Interactive.

Maybe a charitable “why” is in order. Who are these guys and what went so wrong? A quick rundown of the usual suspects gives us a whole lot of corporations that aren’t exactly warm and fuzzy: GM, AIG, Chrysler, GMAC, AT& T, American Airlines, Goldman Sachs, Freddie and Fannie and most of these guys made the ugly list, too, so why is B of A generally everyone’s whipping boy?

We tolerate bad service, insolence and out and out patronizing rudeness from almost everybody else. How many times has your Big Mac or your Starbucks coffee come out wrong? What do we do? We eat it or drink it and move on only to return again the next day for another whack

And, how come when the damned iPhone” (a term that should actually be trademarked it’s uttered so often) was loved and revered without reservation when it would barely facilitate a ten second call with a battery that was good for about 90 minutes? As I recall, when the Apple stuff first began hitting the market, there were some serious performance issues, but we all just pretended it was cool because Steve Jobs was cool, Apple was cool and the stuff looked way too cool to complain about such a little details as performance for crying out loud. My first iPhone and iPod were the equivalent of beautifully designed $300 paper weights (read very expensive office supplies). They were toys and they acted like toys…broke most of the time.

So what gives? We suffered through the early days of Apple with goofy forgiving smiles plastered on our faces, but when it comes to Bank of America, we just want to crucify the bastards….with rusty nails!

Bank of America used to represent the stuff our social and financial fabric was woven from. They made dreams come true. For millions and millions of Americans for decades they were and still are the stewards of our money; our daily-use checking accounts, even our life savings. They weren’t the enemy. They were our friends. Dream Weavers, so to speak! Home loans, boat loans, car loans, small business loans, big business loans, here a loan, there a loan, everywhere a loan loan. And that comically stylized red, white and blue flag was stamped on all of them.

But now we’re afraid to trust them. You can almost hear the whispers, “Can we still trust them? Do you think we should trust them?”. And I’m curious whether we will ever “choose” to trust them again. If you’re active in the business community as I am, you already know that most people flat out do not trust this company today. In all honesty, I’ve never worked with a company so adamantly and universally disliked by the general public as this one. It’s not all that unusual any longer for a client to tell me they absolutely will not apply for a loan with Bank of America even if it means getting no loan at all. In other words, they wouldn’t take money from B of A a second time even if it was given to them, which at today’s interest rates, if one qualified, almost equates to money “given to them”. That’s some serious dislike right there, folks.

And as far as trust goes, the first thing my clients do when they reach the end of the road involving a potential short sale or foreclosure involving Bank of America Home Loan is to ask if they should withdraw all of their money from their B of A accounts.

Bank of America customers who are in trouble seem to have a built in alarm that sounds when they think it’s time to throw in the towel. I see it every day in Las Vegas as they hit their own personal bottom and begin to batten down the hatches in preparation for trouble ahead. Had this same alarm tripped on the front end as they were acquiring these same assets they were about to lose, trouble may have been avoided altogether.

So where does the fault really lie? Are these opinions fair? Or are they founded in fact or simply emotion-based?

Most mortgage holders I have worked with are of the mindset (incorrectly, I might add) that if this is the end of the Bank of America Home Loans saga, then it is also the end of their relationship with Bank of America, period.

In my opinion, this isn’t a prudent strategy and worse, can prove to be an unnecessarily bad one. In fact, at almost any point in time that I have experienced financial challenges in my adult life, either personally or professionally, somehow Bank of America was involved and almost invariably they were also involved in stepping in to turn things around for me.

They are in essence a short term commercial loan bank with a very short memory and they most definitely want to lend you money! They must lend you money to stay in business and they would still be lending you money had the federal government not made it possible for them to survive and prosper without lending you money! Now that’s the true meaning of a conundrum or Finance 101 post 2008.

Strange as it may sound, it isn’t uncommon today for a mortgage holder to fear that if they miss their B of A mortgage payment, the “Monster” will simply pay themselves by appropriating funds from the consumer’s ancillary B of A checking account. Most people are grossly unaware of their rights and how lawful business works and there is surprisingly little understanding as to what is actually happening to them in both a direct sense or within the macro-economic big picture.

I would go so far as to say many troubled homeowners tend to make things worse on themselves when they begin trying to dig out of the hole the dug rather happily just a few years earlier. And even if given sound advice and all the “correct” answers, odds are they’ll turn right around and make the wrong decision about 50% of the time.

In hindsight, we seem to be a collective citizenry which has grossly mismanaged our financial lives maybe here in Las Vegas even more than in other parts of the country. Many of the people I routinely come in contact with have simply not saved nor developed a strategy for any sort of financial security beyond about 90 days much less formulated a retirement plan and this short fuse is what set off the early foreclosure wave which snowballed into devalued housing prices.

For many people, the financial meltdown of the housing industry presented a “perfect storm” opportunity to cry foul on Bank of America (or any other bank) and turn their own inability or unwillingness to pay the piper into a blame game. In reality, tens of thousands of mortgage holders had simply taken advantage of government-mandated home loans; an artificially bloated economy and extremely loose and plentiful credit. A perfect recipe for developing a lifestyle totally at odds with one’s net income. Simply speaking, we bought too much crap and spent like drunken sailors. Just one little problem; it wasn’t our money we were spending. We suffered from an addict mentality and our drug of choice was credit. First we complained when we couldn’t get enough credit, then blamed our enablers for giving us so much credit we overdosed on it.

The “blame game” tactic we see so often today reminds me of 9/11 which, let’s face it, noticeably affected Las Vegas for about three weeks which was the outside extent of the disruption at that time. What started as a “blip” of a business disruption, quickly turned into a rather odd and inexplicable phenomenon. It seemed that when one experienced any sort of finance-related problems at all, the 9/11 attacks were the culprit. Whether it be business, personal or worst of all the complete demise of their business, it was still the 9/11 attacks. Frankly unless you owned a business headquartered in or operating out of the World Trade Center or within the immediate proximity, you probably realized very little if any impact on your business. This is not to say I’m unaware of the travel and tourism impact, etc. but the collective psychological pattern around that time is similar to what we’re seeing now in the real estate industry.

Many people who lost their businesses (for whatever reason) around that time period attributed the terrorist attacks to the demise of their operations. The conversations would go something like this:

Query: “Dave what happened to your business?”

Response: “Oh, 9/11”

Query: “But you owned a pizza shop on the Las Vegas Strip?”

Response: “Yeah, totally killed my traffic. I just couldn’t recover.”

Now, I don’t claim to be a Donald Trump or our recently departed Apple Super-CEO, Steve Jobs, but I do know one thing and that’s if your business can’ t withstand three weeks of slow traffic, then you have a piss poor business model, my friend!

A pizza shop in New York City…..of course you’re going to have a rough go of it for a while. A branch office in one of the fly-over states with corporate headquarters in NYC, yup, I can make the correlation there, too, but here in Las Vegas, it was a bit of a stretch, wouldn’t you agree? I know it didn’t have that kind of impact in the Las Vegas market because I was right here. I was laying on the couch in the office of my empty start-up waiting for business to resume, which it did in about a week to ten days. Then it literally boomed! Truth be known I still pretty much attribute the 9/11 attacks for ultimately igniting the residential boom in Las Vegas because all of the massive production home building companies that had a presence in our market; NYSE companies like Pulte, DR Horton & KB had completely stopped pulling permits for almost 60 days. Then once the smoke cleared (no pun intended) they were never really able to catch up to the production demand for what was a burgeoning southwestern Boom-Town before during and after the attacks. But with this latest recession it is becoming a similar mentality. It is an excuse to fail. Everyone is busy looking for scapegoat instead of adjusting and getting back to work.

Now back to where B of A fits into the equation. Of course, the answer to the earlier question of whether or not to drain your B of A accounts as a protection tactic is a resounding “NO”. I remind clients who are considering this that B of A is just another large corporation with employees like you and me. It just happens to be a financial institution backed by and audited by the federal government. They are not internet thieves nor are they going to sweep your account like a computer hacker if for no other reason than it is highly illegal.

An interesting incident occurred once when I was representing Bank of America on a foreclosure sale and while I was on the phone with a Regional Vice-President going over an offer on their property, the pre-approval for the sale blipped up on my computer screen and I immediately boasted, “Well, not only do we have the home sold at an above- price offer, but a pre-approval just hit my email box from my local B of A loan officer!” Whereupon the regional V-P exclaimed, “What?! Don’t use B of A or we’ll never get it closed!”

So, what’s really going on here? Has the free world gone insane or instead of “Too Big to Fail” perhaps it should just be “Too Big”. Prior to the recent reports of huge impending layoffs, Bank of America would have employed almost 300,000 people according to my research thus, making it the largest bank holding company in the United States and the 2nd largest by market capitalization. It operates in all 50 states and 40 foreign countries and holds 12.2% of all U.S deposits. That’s a lot of damn money and that’s a lot of damn power! In other words, they ain’t goin’ nowhere so we all might as well get used to seeing that squiggly little red, white and blue flag icon.

Their Achilles heel may very well be that they are processing somewhere around 5 million residential and commercial loans that are currently in default. At maybe three human resources per defaulted loan to evaluate, process and dispose of each property, it would take roughly 15 million people or almost 3% of the entire “legal” U.S. population to ramp-up and barrel though that magnitude of workload. If that same workload were compressed into resolving all of the default issues by say Christmas of next year it would probably take double that amount of people, so in short, it can’t be done very quickly.

Compounding this is the uncertainty on national and world socio-economic and political fronts; turmoil within their own management; an ever-changing corporate culture; economic crises at large and variables like human error, bad deals and huge legal issues, i.e. Countrywide, Merrill-Lynch & Robo-Signing,  I’m honestly thinking they really aren’t doing too bad. In fact, if you are truly able to comprehend what a colossal mess this crises has become, one might say they are actually performing quite well under the circumstances!

So, does that make you feel any better about losing your home or your new car or your business? Of course not. Don’t get me wrong, this is a clinical analysis. If I could have gotten my hands on any one of literally dozens of the minimum wage paper shuffling dimwits who repeatedly lost documents and spouted inaccurate, irrelevant and sometimes illegal information while I was making a sincere attempt to modify my own B of A loan from the comfort of my own severely depreciated custom home, I would probably be writing this from Clark County Detention awaiting trial. This entire boondoggle has gone on now for almost five years as an example of an operational business model gone berserk on a previously unimaginable level!

My observations are offered both from the standpoint of a victim and a vendor who actually works with B of A on a daily basis. I’m interested in this because they are not going away and because I believe it is a story that needs to be told. I’m not an insider, but I am a fairly unbiased outsource dealing routinely with not only Bank of America, but Bayview, Wells Fargo, Aurora, America’s Servicing Corporation (ASC), CitiGroup/Bank, JP Morgan, etc. We’ve done deals with them all.

So, don’t kill the messenger and don’t think I’m interviewing for a job with B of A either. I’m quite happy with my self-employed position in life running a small successful boutique real estate brokerage and critiquing other! I also offer the disclaimer (happily) that I am no longer a B of A stockholder.

Talk about Perception becoming Reality, not too long ago I was at the regional B of A headquarters for a meeting and couldn’t help but notice the armed guard posted right next to the reception desk. Hmmmmm. I think it was abundantly clear the Bank’s image, at least here in Las Vegas, might be in need of a little PR tender loving care.

Now, for those of us in the real estate industry, we don’t regard the name “Bank of America” as a whole any longer. Our long arduous days in the trenches of short sale processing and servicing Real Estate Owned (REO) properties are spent dealing with the limited derivatives of the Big Kahuna, not corporate. We might as well be dealing with a local franchise. We know our players as BOA, Home Loans or BAC, or the like with a regional or divisional city headquarters soon to follow as I.D. because any organization the size of this one does not move cohesively as one giant unit and this behemoth is no different.

Bank of America is broken into many different regions and divisions. And we simply refer to them as B of A, a little like Cher or Oprah. So in a sense Bank of America is the Oprah of banks. It’s a powerful “brand” that we are dealing with here no doubt and the brand is really what is in trouble. Less so, the individual parts of that branded whole.

Bank of America is so much a household name and such a part of our daily lives that it would not be unusual to tag them with an acronym nickname and assume everyone knew to whom we referred. I mean we all do that, right? Even outside the U.S. where I travel frequently Bank of America is widely recognized. Much so than say the average American would know Deutsche Bank or could even correctly pronounce Deutsche Bank. I’ve often wondered if it would be possible to re-brand Bank of America; maybe give it a new lease on life because that is usually the American way of doing thing. Maybe in five or ten years they could try out “Bank American” or “American Bank” and we could all just pretend none of this ever happened!

A public relations problem in America is generally handled through re-invention and a huge ad campaign; you just “redo yourself”. That’s typically what our athletes and politicians do, however, in this case the brand is so strong and the legalities and sheer expense of attempting such a PR effort move might be not only cost prohibitive, but psychologically untenable. In short, it would be ridiculously expensive to make Bank of America go away through any means and to their credit, that concept may not ever make it onto the agenda. For all we know, B of A’s corporate mindset might very well be that they have done nothing wrong at all and possibly, in retrospect, that may turn out to be the reality.

The focus of my interest in this topic is that I have found most of what we are forced to deal with involving Bank of America is not directly their fault. I am not saying their hands are entirely clean and they are innocent as the driven snow. But I am saying that much of the press regarding contradictions and apparent non-communication or incommunicative behavior may not always be what it seems. Sometimes the old accusation of “not really seeming to know what is going on” isn’t necessarily them. And that’s the truth.

Some of the bank notes originated through B of A are actually still held by B of A and are truly Bank of America Loans. Mine happens to be one of those, but the vast majority of these home loans are only serviced by B of A and held by investors all over the globe and at this juncture of the game, the “investors” are ultimately the ones calling the shots.

Once you really begin to systematically study the mortgage crises and begin to painstakingly unscramble the egg that is when it really gets interesting. As a business owner and consumer, I made a concerted effort about a year ago to become part of the solution instead of part of the problem and by doing so I’ve also made a lot of money along the way.

If you’re reading this hoping for full-on condemnation of Bank of America, this isn’t it; quite the contrary. I would tell you the same thing I tell my clients… like it or not Bank of America is not going away. They are here to stay. In fact, they are such a powerful entity that I dare say they are probably as safe a bet as the actual U.S. dollar. Now some of you will indeed doubt the future if our currency and debate its solvency, as well, but that is a subject for another time. We at Meridias Realty Group are on the winning edge of being associated with Bank of America after a long topsy-turvy relationship. My whole approach to our relationship has been, “if you can’t beat them, join them” and that is exactly what we have done.

Upon closer examination and being indoctrinated once more through a second and even third go around, things are going quite well for us. Not so much with B of A yet since in many ways they haven’t fared as well due to the reasons I’ve cited throughout this article mainly the disadvantages of sheer size and scope. They are still dealing with significant issues which time and strong, skilled management will eventually cure.

Furthermore, putting emotions aside, I have concluded it is entirely probable that they are as much victims in many ways as some of us have been and to a degree have been misrepresented in a multitude of similar ways. Believe it or not, I have the facts to back it up so stay tuned!

End of Part 1 – Bank of America – Red, White & Bruised

A part of the Vegas Intel blog by Michael G. Hutchings

published by Meridias Media & Bizwala and posted on

MacDonald Highlands

April 6th, 2012

Vacation Rentals

March 20th, 2012

Slab Removal

February 3rd, 2012

Red, White & Bruised – The Aftermath of Bank of America

November 4th, 2011

Vegas Intel: High-Rise Gridlock

January 23rd, 2011

Meridias Case Study/Winter 2010 – Palms Place “Snap-Shot” (Condominium Hotel)

Written by Michael G. Hutchings

Dateline: November 1, 2010 08:30 – Bizwala Newswire – Released AP Wire – Las Vegas, Nevada at Palms Place Tower within The Palms Resort Compound.

Part I

As endorsed in last summer’s print advertisement that publicizes this ultra-cool eatery (SIMON), I sit amongst a variety of my electronic devices and pertinent documents, to wit; a lap-top with fans whirring, iPhone processing data and many business papers bearing various charts & graphs spread evenly across one of the poolside tables at SIMON restaurant, located inside the Palms Place Condo Hotel in Las Vegas.

I am comfortably perched right next to the edge of the pool visually, at least; as poolside at that particular spot means that there is a thick pane of glass curtain wall keeping me air-conditioned cool and potentially mechanically shaded (upon request) from the 100+ degree heat of the southwestern exposed pool deck.

It is almost impossible not to take in the heavenly bodies that stretch-out alongside this poolside vantage point. Human eye-candy lounging comfortably like flesh-toned, tattooed works of art that adjust per the altering direct sunlight and whose nonchalant, easy-going demeanor seems to match the pre-requisite SIMON cotton candy and light-hearted junk-food fare offered to its brunch patrons. To which the likes of “ingestia” I haven’t seen elsewhere since the travelling carnivals used to come to town in the late 70’s.

The cotton-candy, and “the talent” around the pool is a real hit and is the type of atmosphere that is relatively low cost to produce and most importantly it feels like it belongs in Vegas. More so even than some of the multi-million dollar works of art that have recently been purchased positioned about the grounds in some of the newer mega-resorts costing 20 times the amount Palms Place did to develop.

This trendy establishment is truly in sync with the most current Las Vegas demographics and this particular venue was conceived by none other than Kerry Simon, the Rock & Roll-esque “brainchild” of the original SIMON at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino.

He’s definitely one of the coolest chef’s I’ve ever met. And, he is the king of comfort food which bodes well in these recessionary times. Simon has a serious side as a Chef as well, however; and when night falls the entrée’s he concocts, like the Tandoori Lamb;  is all business.

I see him regularly at the restaurant itself, which is rare for a celebrity Chef. And, he pretty much always swings by the table to see how everyone is faring, especially if at the table are seated attractive females. His eye contact is always a bit more direct with the ladies than with the men. But, hey that’s the way things roll at Palms Place. It’s hard not to look, gaze; or even stare.

I continue to pick off of the menu items ordering items “one by one” enjoying the best, if not;  most ingenious Brunch experience Las Vegas has to offer. It’s pretty clear that as successful as this venue is, shoved up on the second floor of a nearly empty condo hotel “off-strip” that Chef Simon and his home base is a winner, despite the economy and the conditions under which he must make his numbers work.

The particular SIMON advertisement I alluded to earlier  to depicts a pretty female model in a bikini peeking over the shoulder of young, brash businessman trying to keep his mind on his work as he sits poolside close to, or possibly in the exact same table as I now sit pecking away at an iMac.

My goal is to write within the atmosphere for which I analyze in an attempt to summarize the complex “sub-market” that all but consists either virtually or completely of the nearly 600 Condo Hotel (or Condotel units, as I call them) stacked above me 52+ stories high.

“Might as well go to the belly of the beast” I thought, “especially; if the belly of the beast is poolside at one of the top hotspots in Las Vegas.”

All this, in an attempt to analyze where we are and where we might be going within the notorious Las Vegas “high-rise” microcosm that has now fallen from epic heights measured both in aspiration and through tangible “Bricks & Mortar” losses.

Also, through this quest I may perhaps gain some insight into the watershed of the high-end market as a whole, which seems to be feeling the hit even more than the earlier massacred median priced product found through-out the Las Vegas Valley.

As I work, I keep hearing the lyrics to the song Sweet Child O’ Mine by Guns n’ Roses. Axel Rose is singing, “Where do we go now, Where do we go…” over and over again in my brain.

In short, the entire history of residential high-rise in Las Vegas from the time period when Bugsy Segal built the original Flamingo, to the onset of the boom was under 5,000 units, and that took fifty years to conceive, build and absorb.

Add that up for a minute…

That’s an absorption rate of around 100 units a year. Why? Because Las Vegas has always pretty much been a horizontal market.

Since the modern development business began, Las Vegas has been synonymous with and has consisted of cheap land. And, as prices continue to deflate across the board, it will revert back to that platform for the next generation.

It makes no sense to develop vertically when it’s less expensive to spread out horizontally. Unless, you are Alan Schachtman Sr. V.P. at FiField Cos. managing Allure Las Vegas, who invoked his logic at a recent housing seminar stating that it is less expensive to construct high rise residences and more green than going the traditional route. First time I had heard that one?

From my experience it has traditionally been less expensive and risky to sprawl than go high density. Although as one “expert” he did argue this point at a recent industry symposium, however; I still find that difficult to believe.

I’ve said repeatedly since this whole high-rise “boom” began, that the need for vertical construction in the Las Vegas valley as a whole is fictitious. It was generally an ego-maniacal folly undertaken by amateur developers who concocted a false demand built on delusional hype. In only very few isolated cases was there a need for even a shred of necessity for said form to follow any function whatsoever.

Two prime examples in the Las Vegas market that come to mind where it was arguably necessary are the Palms Place project and having inside knowledge of how the CityCenter Project was conceived I can argue with great confidence that MGM International (MGM Mirage at the time) had no other alternative than to go in the direction that they did with CityCenter.

The Palms because they defined and nailed their Targeted Consumer Group better than anyone I had seen since I began analyzing Las Vegas in 1997, and CityCenter because quite frankly they had no place left to grow, either in brand or physically. And, they already owned the land.

With ten major casino’s spanning the gamut and the entire length of the Strip from lowly brands like Circus Circus to the iconic Bellagio. Literally, there was no other logical play by MGM with regard to developing their final remaining land positions, namely the 55 West piece that we now know as CityCenter.

As far as the other ill-conceived, under-researched projects with asinine advertising and marketing campaigns, whose height stacked one upon the other literally would be at least a mile long, it was a demand built completely on hyperbole. And now, for the most part they stand all but empty.

Since 2004, Las Vegas as a market has seen high-rise inventory grow in numbers over five times that initial static absorption in both developed and complete product, or let’s say physically built product. I say “physically built” because there were in excess of 100,000 units on the drawing board at the peak “boom” cycle. Twelve thousand (12,000) of those units have collectively been brought to market after an inordinately long construction period post-2008. That period, of course; stands as the clear water-mark dating one of the worst financial crises our country may have ever seen. And if not the worst, perhaps the swiftest and most visually graphic; as the world watched our perils play-out in living color each day on CNN like a low-budget made for TV movie only with really homely actors, i.e. Hank Paulson.

Today, thousands and thousands of unsold and unoccupied units languish on the market like forgotten little gems all up and down the Strip. These residences were once considered precious “life-style” boxes in the sky, sought after mostly by unsophisticated, “jade green with greed” Mom & Pop “flip-monsters” laying down deposits equal to hundreds of thousands of dollars like they were twenty dollar spins at the roulette wheel.

Pricing per square foot easily rose north of $2,000 at Mandarin Oriental and at my last ride (the ill-fated St. Regis); which was the beginning of the end of that era. At the St. Regis or the tower that was to be built “over” the Palazzo by Las Vegas Sands, we were flirting with sales prices upwards to $4,000 per sq. ft. and for a brief moment were getting it in deposit form from our would be suitors!

Those days are now all but; forgotten. No velocity, no demand or urgency, no financing and very few qualified Buyers for those properties exist today. It’s sort of like pickin’ through the bone yard now.

And, most potential Buyers cannot truly understand how to analyze or decipher a good deal today if their life depended on it, in what amounts to very complex moving targets.

The primary flaw that will be the fly in our ointment of recovery is that it is still a speculative market. Even after the clear lessons have been taught a mere year or so ago; the bottom feeders are back in rare form. To further add insult to injury, most developers are still working with them; further chumming up the waters and clouding the marketplace.

Again, the two smartest players took their ball and went home. MGM International and Palms Place have all but shut down their Sales Operations, dropped sail and are concentrating on other areas of their business model. Although, this isn’t exactly what I would recommend, it makes more sense than basically prostituting out your project in the worst market correction of all time, which is exactly what a number of inexperienced and short-sighted developers have done.

Part II – Strategic Recourse

One of the most insulting and tragic stories of the Strip are the reactionary entities that followed every feint and each fake the financial markets dealt out along the journey from late 2008 when the lights came on, until roughly; now.

The developers who attempted to package the height of luxury, style and panache when the market was up and who buckled under their own ineptitude and sold-out time and time again, advertising rock bottom prices, auctions, rental programs, free move-ins all in exchange for trade services and referrals — are truly paying the price today.

One project on the Strip we are sure has actual squatters living in the building occupying abandoned units and one rumor has it that the developer representative allowed a local Disc Jockey to move in “rent free” simply in exchange for his customer database.

This in a building designed by an out of state developer who pre-sold residences at an average price in excess of a half million dollars.

Short sighted stunts like that can damage reputations in a building so badly that even when the market has recovered, the stigmatism attached to the address could take decades in which to turn the tide.

Another project is known for the prostitution trade and for the place to rent for our illustrious exotic dancer industry. Great package for the pool amenity as a few enigmatic pariahs around the building is good for elevator gossip. But, when affinity groups like this “move-in” then you’ve just sold a $100M to $1B brand “down the river” permanently. The over-all reputation of a building is priceless, and a downslide is difficult to reverse once it hits that slippery slope.

Now granted some of you will write me and ask me to name these projects, because you’ll want to buy or rent there, but; there is a fine line between fun and the danger that goes with the type of crowd some of these elements attract. And I can assure you when it comes to taking out the check book and drafting a down stroke for $250,000 cash and upwards, these factors will contribute.

There are only two directions, read “solutions” to employ in markets like these and if a developer takes the low road, neither is gonna work, i.e. Allure.

1)    “Marry Up, Don’t Dummy Down”

2)    Leverage Your Assets

And, I will explain what those two new terms mean in the context of residential Sales & Marketing, a bit later…In Part III.

Opportunity For One Outstanding Realtor

December 14th, 2010

Meridias Realty Group

Unfinished Mansion

October 27th, 2010

High Rise Living

October 27th, 2010

Developers Private Reserve

October 26th, 2010